Journal for the Study of the Old Testament

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, Vol. 19, No. 64, 83-90 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/030908929401906406
© 1994 SAGE Publications

David's Innocence: a Response To J. Wright

Noel Bailey

Department of Biblical Studies, University of Sheffield

This is a refutation of John Wright's argument ('The Innocence of David in 1 Chronicles 21', JSOT 60 [1993], pp. 87-105) that the census in 1 Chron. 21 was provoked by a military crisis, and that Joab and not David is responsible for the wrath of God.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?