Journal for the Study of the Old Testament

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cryer, F. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, Vol. 21, No. 69, 3-16 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/030908929602106901
© 1996 SAGE Publications

Of Epistemology, Northwest-Semitic Epigraphy and Irony: the 'Bytdwd/House of David' Inscription Revisited

Frederick H. Cryer

University of Copenhagen, Institute for Biblical Exegesis K06 Magergade 44-46 1150 Copenhagen K , Denmark

Recent studies attempting to deal with the 'bytdwd/House of David' inscription have revealed madequacies in the knowledge of the theory of theory formation pertaining to historical research on the part of their authors. A detailed analysis of the palaeographical basis for dating the inscriptions previously found on the site shows that they cannot be used for dating purposes, if they were so used, they would more likely point to the eighth century than to any other time Finally, an analysis of the palaeographical study by Josef Tropper shows that he has recognized a number of the problems of the earlier treatments. Tropper remains, however, under the Spell of the publishers' claim of a ninth-century provenance for the inscription, with the ironical result that the types identified by him do not even agree with the tabula scriptorum in his own 1993 study of the Syrian-Phoenician inscriptions. A ninth-century date cannot be maintained on the basis of inscriptional finds.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?