This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Barrick, W. B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Saul's Demise, David's Lament, and Custer's Last Stand

2610 Glenwood Lane, Billings, MT 59102

Many readers, beginning with Josephus (Ant. 6.4.343-50), perceive the death of Saul as narrated in 1 Sam. 31 (1 Chron. 10).1-6 to be heroic or otherwise ennobling, a courageous but doomed 'last stand' in defense of his people. P.K. McCarter in par ticular finds this characterization also in the lament, translating 2 Sam. 1.19a 'Alas, prince of Israel [= Saul] slain standing erect', the pose evocative of bravery. This characterization, however, is a case of eisegesis spawned by the workings of the 'Martyred Hero' paradigm in the reader's mind and readerly imagination. This paradigm, identified by folklorist B.A. Rosenberg, is typified by the American popu lar legend of 'Custer's Last Stand' which envelops the death of Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer at the Battle of the Little Bighorn (25 June 1876). Without this external and perhaps culturally anachronistic template, the ancient Hebrew narrative is seen to represent Saul's death as cowardly and disgraceful. McCarter's mgenious treatment of 'al bmôteykâ hlll in 2 Sam. 1.19a (and 1.25b) is rejected on philolo gical and literary grounds in favor of 'slain upon thy back', originally proposed by D.N. Freedman in 1964. It is doubtful whether these materials yield anything sub stantive about the actual circumstances of Saul's death—assuming, of course, that Saul actually existed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?