<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com">
<title>Journal for the Study of the Old Testament recent issues</title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Journal for the Study of the Old Testament RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Journal for the Study of the Old Testament</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0309-0892</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/19?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/39?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/59?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/81?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/99?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/19?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/32?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/49?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/59?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/73?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/149?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/184?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/199?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/241?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/248?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/395?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/435?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/457?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/475?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/487?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/501?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/267?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/287?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/311?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/331?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/339?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/353?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/383?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://jot.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Journal for the Study of the Old Testament</title>
<url>http://jot.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Redeemed by His Love? The Characterization of Shechem in Genesis 34]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article gives consideration to the apparent `rehabilitation' of the character of Shechem in the narrative of Genesis 34, following his initially negative portrayal as the rapist of Dinah, Jacob's daughter. Through a close analysis of the Hebrew language used by the narrator within this text to describe Shechem's actions and emotions, this article argues that this biblical rapist's depiction is perhaps not as `redemptive' as it may first appear. Furthermore, the article takes to task those interpreters who not only argue in favour of a textual basis for Shechem's seeming `rehabilitation', but who also suggest that such a redemption is understandable, if not merited.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blyth, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208094457</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Redeemed by His Love? The Characterization of Shechem in Genesis 34]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>18</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/19?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Golden Calf Story: Constructively and Deconstructively]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/19?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Unlike other postmodern reading practices, deconstruction suppresses the figure of the reader: the text is viewed as both engendering and undermining its meaning, while the reader's role is only to discover these processes. Yet, when one deconstructs biblical texts, `anarchic' and `lacking logic' according to traditional Western criteria, the illusion vanishes, and it is hard to get along without the reader as an active figure. The reader's role is actively to construct the meaning of the text, before it gets deconstructed. This is the reason why in some recent works the deconstructive reading of the text is preceded by a `constructive' one. In this article the Golden Calf story (Exod. 32) is read both constructively and deconstructively. The constructive reading focuses on the opposition `normative cult&mdash;deviant cult' which is viewed as central to the story. Normative cult and deviant cult are represented by the Tablets of the Law and the Golden Calf respectively. The deconstruction of this opposition is based on the fact that the tablets and the calf receive the same treatment: Moses destroys both of them.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slivniak, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208094458</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Golden Calf Story: Constructively and Deconstructively]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>38</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/39?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Ambiguous Ending: Dynastic Punishment in Kings and the Fate of the Davidides in 2 Kings 25.27-30]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/39?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The portrayal of the fates of the dynasties of the North in Kings shows that, in Deuteronomistic theology, only one king in a royal house need cause the people to sin to mandate the destruction of the entire house. Since Manasseh also causes the people to sin, we might assume that the Deuteronomic History (Dtr) intends the same fate for the Davidides. However, Dtr is deliberately ambiguous in regard to the future of the Davidides following the exile&mdash;besides the specific reference to Manasseh's sin, it also includes (but does not explicitly annul) the unconditional covenant with David, and includes a conclusion that permits readers to interpret the narrative as forecasting either hope for Davidic restoration or annulment of the Davidic covenant. This ambiguity suits the exilic period of composition of Dtr, when the fate of the Davidides was unknown, and so should not be taken as evidence for redaction.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janzen, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208094459</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Ambiguous Ending: Dynastic Punishment in Kings and the Fate of the Davidides in 2 Kings 25.27-30]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>58</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>39</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/59?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Silence of the Wives: Bakhtin's Monologism and Ezra 7--10]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/59?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article examines an understudied aspect of Bakhtin's literary theory, monologism, and then brings the observations to bear on the account of the sending away of Israel's foreign wives in Ezra 7&mdash;10. Bakhtin's ethical interests make his work a promising lens through which to view this troubling text. It allows a reader to describe the diversity of narrative techniques used to characterize Ezra and his mission while still recognizing the underlying unity of the text's message. In fact, the multiplicity of voices in the text may serve to mask its monologic effect. However, these chapters in Ezra may also be read within the context of a canon, which does comprise polyphony, undercutting Ezra's message.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hays, C. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208094460</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Silence of the Wives: Bakhtin's Monologism and Ezra 7--10]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>80</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>59</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/81?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Strike his bone and his flesh': Reading Job from the         Beginning]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/81?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Following the destruction of Job's children and possessions in Job 1, traditional                 readings of ch. 2 understand the Satan to be demanding that Job himself be struck                 down as a test of his disinterested piety. Instead, this study argues that the                 Satan's language in Job 2 invites us to read it from `the beginning' (Gen.                 1&mdash;3) and that when we do, the Satan is seen to be demanding not Job's                 life, but rather his wife. Such a reading complicates traditional characterizations                 of Job's wife as merely the Satan's tool by introducing the idea that she is also                 Satan's target.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shepherd, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208094461</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Strike his bone and his flesh': Reading Job from the         Beginning]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>97</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>81</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/99?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ezekiel's Visionary Call as Prologue: From Complexity and Changeability to         Order and Stability?]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/99?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article reads Ezekiel 1 as a prologue to the entire book of Ezekiel and deals                 with the tension between the vision of the living creatures in Ezekiel 1 and the                 vision of the temple in the epilogue, Ezekiel 40&mdash;48. It is argued that                 the vision in Ezekiel 1 signals complexity and changeability. The prologue is                 characterized by various kinds of category transgressions (cf. for instance the                 monstrosity of the living creatures). In Ezekiel 40&mdash;48, the new temple                 signals the opposite: order and stability. The book of Ezekiel uses both aspects to                 describe Yahweh as a god who is able to change the situation of the exiles and                 ensure future stability. A short section discusses passages from the book of                 Revelation as examples of the re-use in the New Testament of motifs from the book of                 Ezekiel.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nielsen, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208094462</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ezekiel's Visionary Call as Prologue: From Complexity and Changeability to         Order and Stability?]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>114</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Duping the Prophet: On {dalet}{nun}{alef} (Amos 7.8b) and Amos's Visions]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The logic and imagery of Amos's third vision (Amos 7.7-9), which centers on the                 obscure word K , have been the subject of much debate. This essay advances a new                 interpretation of the third vision that presupposes that God, in both the third and                 fourth visions, prevents Amos from interceding on Israel's behalf (as Amos had done                 after the first and second visions) by having the prophet himself unwittingly mouth                 Israel's sentence. The third vision, like the fourth, depends on a pun that only a                 native northerner, and not a native southerner like Amos, would have sniffed             out.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Novick, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208094464</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Duping the Prophet: On {dalet}{nun}{alef} (Amos 7.8b) and Amos's Visions]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>128</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[1. General]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208091717</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[1. General]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>18</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/19?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2. Archaeology and Epigraphy]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/19?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208091718</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2. Archaeology and Epigraphy]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>31</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/32?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3. History, Geography and Sociology]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/32?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208091719</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3. History, Geography and Sociology]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>48</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>32</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/49?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[4. Texts and Versions]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/49?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208091721</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[4. Texts and Versions]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>58</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>49</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/59?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[5. Exegesis and Modern Translations]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/59?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208091722</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[5. Exegesis and Modern Translations]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>72</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>59</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/73?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[6. Literary Criticism and Introduction (Including History of Interpretation, Canon and Special Studies)]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/73?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208091723</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[6. Literary Criticism and Introduction (Including History of Interpretation, Canon and Special Studies)]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>148</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/149?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[7. Law, Religion and Theology]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/149?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208091724</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[7. Law, Religion and Theology]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>183</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>149</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/184?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[8. The Life and Thought of the Surrounding Peoples]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/184?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208091725</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[8. The Life and Thought of the Surrounding Peoples]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>198</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>184</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/199?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[9. Apocrypha and Postbiblical Studies]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/199?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208091726</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[9. Apocrypha and Postbiblical Studies]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>240</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/241?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[10. Philology and Grammar]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/241?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208091727</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[10. Philology and Grammar]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>247</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>241</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/248?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Books Also Received or Received Too Late for Review in 2008]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/32/5/248?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208091729</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Books Also Received or Received Too Late for Review in 2008]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>253</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>248</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/395?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hezekiah's Alleged Cultic Centralization]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/395?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The recent article in this journal by I. Finkelstein and N. Silberman (<I> JSOT</I> 30 [2006]: 259-85), in which the authors attempted to establish the historicity of Hezekiah's religious centralization by linking it with archaeological evidence for the closing of shrines at Arad, Beersheba, and Lachish, highlights the need for historians to reconsider this issue. Finkelstein and Silberman's article lacks the mandatory critical evaluation of the biblical text and inappropriately dates selected archaeological evidence to the reign of a specific king. A re-examination of the highly charged issue of cult centralization in the late eighth century BCE is overdue, and this study offers some needed corrections to the analysis of Finkelstein and Silberman and proposes what is considered to be a more cogent understanding of the reality underlying the biblical claim of a cultic centralization undertaken by Hezekiah. This study does not deal with the separate issue of Hezekiah's alleged cultic reform.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edelman, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208092138</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hezekiah's Alleged Cultic Centralization]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>434</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>395</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/435?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reopening the Discussion: Another Contextual Look at the Sons of God]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/435?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Using Lyle Eslinger's work on the text as a stepping stone, this article contends                 that&mdash;in contrast to general opinion&mdash;Gen. 6.1-8 is a carefully                 structured, unified section which was consciously inserted to inform the reader                 about the developments that led to the flood. The Genesis passage is                 preceded by the depiction of two opposing groups of humanity, one of which is almost                 lost in the verses immediately following the pericope. Through textual and                 contextual analysis, this article tries to show that the sons of God passage serves                 to clarify this disappearance. A non-mythological reading of the text is proposed,                 one which integrates Gen. 6.1-8 into the narrative of Genesis 1-11.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fockner, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208092140</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reopening the Discussion: Another Contextual Look at the Sons of God]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>456</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>435</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/457?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Beautiful Women or 'False Judgment'? Interpreting Genesis 6.2 in the Context         of the Primaeval History]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/457?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In Gen. 6.2 the sons of God see that the daughters of humankind are 'beautiful', yet                 the adjective used in 6.2 is not , 'beautiful, handsome', but , 'good'. An                 examination of the adjective  in the present study leads to the conclusion that  in                 Gen. 6.2 does not mean 'beautiful', but 'good'. This study proposes that 6.2 is not                 connected to the 'beauty' motif found in the ensuing chapters of Genesis, but to the                 'seeing...good' motif in the preceding creation story (Gen. 1-3). The conclusion is                 reached that what sets the story in motion is not the attractive appearance of the                 women, but the false judgment by the sons of God whose actions recall Eve's in Gen.                 3.6.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaminski, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208092142</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Beautiful Women or 'False Judgment'? Interpreting Genesis 6.2 in the Context         of the Primaeval History]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>473</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>457</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/475?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tradition, History, and Our Story: Some Observations on Jacob and Esau in the         Books of Obadiah and Malachi]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/475?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In both Genesis and early prophecy, Jacob, the father of the chosen people of Israel,                 is harshly criticized for the shrewd trickery that he employs to supplant his                 brother Esau. The role reversal of the twins thus challenges later biblical authors.                 It is argued in this study that, from the way this tradition is used for purposes of                 communication in Obadiah and Malachi, two alternative interpretations may be                 discerned. While Obadiah explains the role reversal as a result of Esau's                 misconduct, Malachi interprets it as an inscrutable act of divine election. Tracing                 the latter approach in Paul's letter to the Romans, both the bearing of these                 actualizing interpretations on the tradition itself and the way different                 communities used it as common story are observed.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krause, J. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208092143</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tradition, History, and Our Story: Some Observations on Jacob and Esau in the         Books of Obadiah and Malachi]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>486</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>475</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/487?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Attitudes toward Dogs in Ancient Israel: A Reassessment]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/487?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>For the past half-century, many scholars have argued that the Israelites viewed dogs                 with contempt. They point to passages in the Old Testament that depict dogs as                 despicable creatures who should be avoided. Such a sentiment is puzzling in light of                 the widespread utilization and enjoyment of canines throughout the ancient Near                 East. A closer examination of these Old Testament texts reveals that, although the                 word  was often used pejoratively, dogs were not contemptible in Israelite society.                 In fact, Job 30.1 and Tob. 6.2 and 11.4 illustrate that they were valued for their                 services as sheepdogs, travel companions, guardians, and possibly pets.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miller, G. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208092144</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Attitudes toward Dogs in Ancient Israel: A Reassessment]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>500</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>487</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/501?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Jerusalem in the Persian (and Early Hellenistic) Period and the Wall of Nehemiah]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/501?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Knowledge of the archaeology of Jerusalem in the Persian (and Early Hellenistic) period&mdash;the size of the settlement and whether it was fortified&mdash;is crucial to understanding the history of the province of Yehud, the reality behind the book of Nehemiah and the process of compilation and redaction of certain biblical texts. It is therefore essential to look at the finds free of preconceptions (which may stem from the account in the book of Nehemiah) and only then attempt to merge archaeology and text.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finkelstein, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208093928</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Jerusalem in the Persian (and Early Hellenistic) Period and the Wall of Nehemiah]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>520</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>501</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/267?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Blessing of a Wounded Patriarch: Genesis 27.1-40]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/267?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The interrelation of the characterization of Isaac in Gen. 27.1-40, his blessing in                 27.28-29, and the narrative past constructed for him in the non-Priestly material                 addresses a number of questions that have persisted about the evaluation of this                 blessing and its relation to the divine blessings promised to the patriarchs. The                 present study argues that the character of Isaac restricts and deforms the blessings                 that are the <I>leitmotif</I> of the patriarchal narrative. The thesis is                 articulated in dialogue with current source-critical scholarship on the Pentateuch                 and presents a stratum of biblical material whose conception of Isaac and his                 blessing is at odds with subsequent inner-biblical and post-biblical mainstream                 interpretations. Perspectives derived from the nexus of character, blessing, and                 narrative 'history' are germane for understanding the oracle to Rebekah (25.23) and                 the different uses of <I>niphal</I> and <I> hithpael</I> verbs in discrete                 passages on the nations' participation in the patriarchal blessings.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sylva, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208090801</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Blessing of a Wounded Patriarch: Genesis 27.1-40]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>286</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>267</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/287?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Problem of Finite Verb Translation in Exodus 15.1-18]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/287?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article examines the finite Hebrew verbs in the song in Exod. 15.1-18. This song                 has long resisted a uniformly accepted translation. Due to its connection with the                 Exodus narrative and the difficulty of translating finite verbs in Hebrew poetry,                 some of the translation problems are exacerbated. This study examines the verbs in                 the song through an aspectual analysis that takes into account the narrative context                 of Exodus. Three models of translation are considered: the Prophetic Perfect Model,                 the Sinai Provenance Model, and the Dual Perspective Model. These three models                 correspond to three views of the verbs in the song: the prophetic perfect, the                 preterite, and the traditional schema of perfect-past,                 imperfect-present/modal/future. Though this study does not arrive at any single                 answer to the verb translation issues, the analysis clearly points out the                 possibilities and the problems of each model within the song-narrative context.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shreckhise, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208090802</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Problem of Finite Verb Translation in Exodus 15.1-18]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>310</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>287</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/311?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Numbers 16: The Significance of Place-- An Analysis of Spatial Markers]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/311?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The present study is devoted to the composite and complex story of Numbers 16. The episode is analyzed through the lenses of the construction of narrative space, paying close attention to the locations where action takes place, to the movements of characters, and to the associated adverbs and prepositions. Seven spatial markers are successively considered in order to sketch an interpretation for the whole episode. The study shows that, as the spatial signals unfold, a symbolic meaning of the story can emerge, the stakes of which concern Israel's organization, its recognition of YHWH, and its very survival.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mirguet, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208090803</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Numbers 16: The Significance of Place-- An Analysis of Spatial Markers]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>330</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>311</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/331?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Removing Ruth: Tiqqune Sopherim in Ruth 3.3-4?]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/331?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Commentators on Ruth 3.3-4 often pause to note the <I>kethib&mdash;qere</I>                 found in these verses, explaining the unusual form of the <I>kethib</I>s                  and                  as archaic                 second feminine singular perfects. This article suggests that the <I>kethib</I>                 forms found in Ruth 3.3-4 are not archaic, but are the result of an intentional                 emendation of the text by a scribe intent on reconciling the passage with the                 teaching of the Torah. The effect of this change is to remove Ruth from any possible                 intimate encounter with Boaz and replace her with Naomi. Thus, these two readings                 should be considered as an unrecognized occurrence of <I>tiqqune sopherim</I>.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Irwin, B. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208090804</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Removing Ruth: Tiqqune Sopherim in Ruth 3.3-4?]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>338</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>331</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/339?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Sanctified 'Adulteress' and her Circumstantial Clause: Bathsheba's Bath         and Self-Consecration in 2 Samuel 11]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/339?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Bathsheba's actions in 2 Sam. 11.2-4 identify crucial aspects of her character. Past                 commentators interpret these words in connection with menstrual purification,                 stressing the certain paternity of David's adulterine child. This article                 demonstrates that the participles <I>roheset</I>                 and <I>mitqaddesset</I> and the noun                     <I>mittum'atah</I> do not denote                 menstrual cleansing. Bathsheba's washing is an innocent bath. She is the only                 individual human to self-sanctify, placing her in the company of the Israelite                 deity. The syntax of the verse necessitates that her action of self-sanctifying                 occurs simultaneously as David lies with her. The three focal terms highlight the                 important legitimacy of Bathsheba before the Israelite deity, her identity as a                 non-Israelite, her role as queen mother of the Solomonic line, and her full                 participation in the narrative.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[D'Ror Chankin-Gould, J., Hutchinson, D., Hilton Jackson, D., Mayfield, T. D., Schulte, L. R., Schneider, T. J., Winkelman, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208090805</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Sanctified 'Adulteress' and her Circumstantial Clause: Bathsheba's Bath         and Self-Consecration in 2 Samuel 11]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>352</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>339</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/353?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Counsellors of the Lord in Isaiah 40--55: A Proposal to         Understand their Role in the Literary Composition]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/353?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The presence of counsellors in Isaiah 40...55 is, although well-known, never                 explained satisfactorily. The main reason for this is the difficulty in giving                 meaning to the mutual relationship between the texts speaking of 'giving counsel'                 (41.28) or being 'a counsellor' (40.13; 46.11). This article seeks to provide a new                 understanding of the function of these counsellors, on the basis of a step-by-step                 examination of these texts, starting from the level of syntax via analyses of                 discourse and participants up to the level of the literary composition. These                 examinations make it clear that the counsellors of Yhwh play a prominent role in the                 disputation between Yhwh and Jacob/Israel about knowledge. In opposition to the                 counsellors of Jacob/Israel, Yhwh presents his own advisers: Wisdom (40.13), the                 failure of the idols (41.28), and Cyrus (46.11).</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oosting, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208090806</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Counsellors of the Lord in Isaiah 40--55: A Proposal to         Understand their Role in the Literary Composition]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>382</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>353</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/383?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Medial Demonstratives {he}{zayin}{lamed}{he},         {vav}{zayin}{lamed}{he}, and         {zayin}{lamed}{he}]]></title>
<link>http://jot.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/383?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>,                 , and                  are synonymous neither with the proximal                 demonstratives ( and )                 nor the distal demonstratives ( and                 ). Rather                 ,                 , and                  are medial demonstratives that signal a                 concrete entity within visual range.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garr, W. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0309089208090807</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Medial Demonstratives {he}{zayin}{lamed}{he},         {vav}{zayin}{lamed}{he}, and         {zayin}{lamed}{he}]]></dc:title>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>389</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>383</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>